9HA.01 / .02 GAS TURBINE0 pages

GE Power & Water

9HA.01/.02 GAS TURBINE

The World’s Largest and Most Efficient Heavy Duty Gas Turbine

The 9HA high efficiency, air cooled gas turbine is the industry leader among H-class offerings. With two available models—the
9HA.01 at 397 MW and the 9HA.02 at 510 MW—customers can select the right capacity to meet their generation needs. Thanks
to a simplified air cooled architecture, advanced materials, and proven operability and reliability, the 9HA delivers the lowest
life cycle cost per MW. The economies of scale created by this high power density gas turbine, combined with its more than 61%
combined cycle efficiency, enables the most cost effective conversion of fuel to electricity to help operators meet increasingly
dynamic power demands.

397-510 MW

Simple Cycle
Output

>61% COMBINED CYCLE EFFICIENCY

Industry-Leading Operational Flexibility for
Increased Dispatch and Ancillary Revenue
• Fast 10-minute ramp-up from start command to gas turbine full load.

• Up to 70 MW/minute ramping capability within emissions compliance.

• Reaches turndown as low as 40% of gas turbine baseload output

within emissions compliance.
• uel flexible to accommodate gas and liquid fuels with wide gas
F
variability, including high ethane (shale) gas and liquefied natural gas.

Least Complex H-Class Offering
• simpler configuration than GE’s previous H-class fleet and
A
one that does not require a separate cooling air system.
• odular systems ease installation and reduce on-site labor
M
requirements.
• treamlined maintenance with quick removal turbine roof,
S
field-replaceable blades, and 100% borescope inspection
coverage for all blades.

Full-Load Validation
• t the heart of GE’s heavy duty gas turbine validation program is
A
the advanced full-scale, full-load test facility in Greenville, SC.
• E’s 9HA gas turbine has been fully validated in its full speed,
G
full-load test facility over an operating envelope larger than the
variances an entire fleet of turbines would experience in the field,
an approach that is superior to operating a field prototype for
8,000 hours.

+/-10%

9HA.02
50
510
8,170
8,620
41.8%
2,430
2,564
40%
70
25
9
+/-10%

Power Plant Configuration
CC Net Output (MW)
CC Net Heat Rate (Btu/kWh, LHV)
CC Net Heat Rate (kJ/kWh, LHV)
CC Net Efficiency (%, LHV)
Bottoming Cycle Type
Plant Turndown – Minimum Load (%)
Ramp Rate (MW/min)
Startup Time (Hot, Minutes)

1x1 SS
9HA.01
592
5,540
5,845
61.6%
3PRH
47%
60
<30

1x1 SS
9HA.02
755
5,517
5,821
61.8%
3PRH
47%
70
<30

Power Plant Configuration
CC Net Output (MW)
CC Net Heat Rate (Btu/kWh, LHV)
CC Net Heat Rate (kJ/kWh, LHV)
CC Net Efficiency (%, LHV)
Bottoming Cycle Type
Plant Turndown – Minimum Load (%)
Ramp Rate (MW/min)
Startup Time (Hot, Minutes)

2x1 MS
9HA.01
1,181
5,540
5,845
61.6%
3PRH
24%
120
<30

2x1 MS
9HA.02
1,515
5,495
5,798
62.1%
3PRH
24%
140
<30

Frequency
SC Net Output (MW)
SC Net Heat Rate (Btu/kWh, LHV)
SC Net Heat Rate (kJ/kWh, LHV)
SC Net Efficiency (%, LHV)
Exhaust Energy (MM Btu/hr)
Exhaust Energy (MM kJ/hr)
GT Turndown Minimum Load (%)
GT Ramp Rate (MW/min)
NOx (ppmvd) at Baseload (@15% O2)
CO (ppm) at Min. Turndown w/o Abatement
Wobbe Variation (%)

9HA.01
50
397
8,220
8,673
41.5%
1,906
2,011
40%
60
25
9